| We are going to discuss
in this article the projection of manipulated live images which
double as audiovisual scores. Sparkles would be: figurative and
graphic images, people dancing under strobe lights. At night, in
nightclubs, raves and malls, the distribution of screens and the
excess of colored lights create experience/space, stimuli/space,
create projections/space. The space stimuli presented here promote
an inverse experience which approaches other image/space devices,
such as the environments found in videogames and interactive virtual
reality. On the other hand, they also pull away since they are made
up of image/light, of sparkling figurative images or not, in sum,
for being structured as audiovisual scores.
We are some kind of
half-time show.
Fernando Pessoa
Names: Lineage and Process
VJ. An acronym for a variety of names. Unfolded, it remits to
poetic paths of expressions. VJs have defined themselves through
their work itself and found concepts for Vjing, putting into play
different ways of creating, of producing representations. The search
for their representations extrapolates comforting classificatory
exercises, and deals with the poetry of Vjing. Attempts of coining
the term brings about underlying problems on the nature and diversity
of expressive potentialities of live manipulation cultures, be them
accompanied or not by sound. VJ: video-jockey, visual-jockey or
video-jam? Depends on the VJ and the place, but it will always be
jamming.
The names bear the implicit understanding of what this artistic
activity is and traces structural elements of the proximity between
expressive means and urban culture. The abbreviation was born in
the 80’s to designate MTV anchors. This lineage does not relate
to the work of the VJs we are looking at in this text, but is interesting
as a first link between image and music. The MTV VJs worked for
a young people’s music television channel, “our”
VJs play images for DJs, with DJs or in counter-time with DJs. Images
and music overlap. VJs working with the production of images in
electronic scenarios can be identified with DJs and television as
they take place live and are improvised, but are different in that
they work behind screens and computers. Differently from MTV’s
VJs, they do not offer their personal image, they create a variety
of images to provoke concept associations as they are manipulated
and projected.
The name video jockey for those professionally working the dance
floor relates to disc jockeys. While the VJs play images previously
ordered in sequence in computers, DJs organize their work using
records and CDs. VJ’s videos count on a support, the video,
of course. In the 90s, dance floors used video tapes. Today, images
can come directly from the computer or even DVDs themselves. The
DVD was initially, a technological substitute for video, its similar
in poetic terms. Today, DVD-J’s allows for live manipulation
of images with distortions created through “scratches”
(the same procedure used by DJs) and non-linear access to images.
The DVD-Js and computers allow for timing to be controlled by the
VJs. Distinct times and rhythm are then created from the same material.
We will not linger on how the construction of temporality comes
to propose different meanings as this will be the subject of another
article.1 What we are interested
in retaining at the moment is that Vjing, within the electronic
scenario, a young realization for young people, has a short history
marked by the technique’s inscription in a poetic context.
The name “visual jockey” was usually associated by
those in the métier with a specific quality of projections
where abstract images presented in an accelerated rhythm predominate,
or in other words, a flux of images which sparkle in speed. If we
amplify visual notions in general, we will be able to better understand
a VJ’s activity. Visual has to do with seeing, to the visible,
including figurative and abstract images, produced upon an algorithm
base without any external material or recorded reference. Visual
can be also image/light, image/landscape or a micro-narrative constructed
through associations. In this perspective the acronym reaffirms
its bonds to the electronic scenario, but is not to be used strictly
bound to a support, but to an object produced by the VJ, images.
Outside Brazil the names Visual Performer and Visual Jammer are
commonly used. The latter title relating once again to the overlapping
between music and image. The sonorous/visual interpenetration when
thinking of “jam, jamming or jammer”2
qualifies the VJ’s poetry. The jam sessions, as is very well
understood by the fans of this kind of music, are jazz shows based
on improvisation, and jamming is the moment in which they improvise.
Jamming relates to this characteristic in the events with VJ’s,
improvisation, live.3 In summary,
VJ’s activities relate to the manipulation of fixed or moving
images, figurative or abstract, which are presented in art galleries,
in raves, at parties or discotheques, based on the improvisations
coming from a previously selected image bank. These images, independent
of their technical origin, exist accompanied by music. Accompany
or are accompanied? Both, as we will see shortly.
Experiences with the projection and manipulation of images are
not something confined to current events. On the contrary, in the
history of cinematographic vanguard, as revealed by Peter Weibel,
Gene Youngblood and other authors, work done with multiple projections
are not unusual. Yoko Ono, Laurie Anderson and the concerts given
by the Vortex Group carried out experiments with multiple screens
in the sixties, as well as experimenting with the division of screens.
Gregory Markoupoulos created multiple projections with different
films experimenting with breaking with the central perspective as
an alternative mode of narration. (Weibel. 2003:117). The couple
Steina and Woody Vasulka, besides exploring space with diverse projections,
touched on the VJ’s poetic sphere by working live. They create
sounds and images which are channeled through synthesizers. To not
make the mentioning of these works a tiring and extensive citation
I will mention, in conclusion, that experiences like the panoramas
in the XVII and XVIII century, or even diverse vanguards in the
20’s including artists such as Lásló Moholy-Nagy
who developed a poetic sphere similar to that of the VJs. By breaking
down the fourth wall in Italian theater they create multiple projections
impossible to be visualized with only one glance, or in other words,
with more than one hundred and eighty degrees with some of their
performances being live. The proximity between poetic spheres of
the aforementioned experiences and that of the VJs does not annul
particularities in the nature of these means of expression. Electronic
culture, experimental environments and images in relation with sounds
and techniques of their visual materiality guarantee poetic characteristics
to the VJ’s work which deserve to be explored.
A few pacts
Space/time, projection and experiential: sentient4
and feeling, visible and visionary are part of the experience. Parties,
multi-sensorial nights. Spaces as something which demarcates the
between, exists here with material visualization. The space between
is visually perceptive, and is usually white, due to the large amount
of smoke, resulting either from cigarette or stage smoke. Smoke
is a resource widely used in theater and cinema to materialize light,
it diffuses the light, forcing its ray to occupy the environment,
providing it with density. Well dosed, smoke is an ally for constructing
a scenario, to give space volume and weight, to diffuse people and
objects, modify standards of distance, as one losses the depth of
field through it. Smoke, lights, projections and sounds create a
party’s environment, an environment which involves and stimulates
spectators, reduces space by limiting fields of vision, creating
a circumscriptive environment even if there are hundreds of people
in the room, and thus produces a sort of smoke screen . It is an
elemental environment and one that creates pacts with the audience.
Delving into a fiction book, a film, an exhibition, a videogame
or piece of interactive art presupposes a few pacts. Some prioritize
illusionistic aspects, others physical and intellectual manipulation,
others revolve around strictly comprehensive aspects. There are
still others which propose and promote feedback between structural
intellectual games and illusionistic fruition. The elements which
structure this pact in books are represented by the plot and/or
language. Some readers abandon themselves to this proposed world,
their immersion/plunge into the story, passing through the acceptance
of a pact constituted through the concentration of their senses
in the narrative. In this sense, the immersible property of a text
is one of the intrinsic elements of its composition5.
-----------------------------------------------
Notes
1 This issue was discussed in
a text presented at the Compôs 2004 by the author entitled:
The VJ’s scenario: between optical and physical stimulation”
2 Vjamm is also a software from
audiovisualizer as well, developed for vjing.
3 In this article we do not
intend to get into improvisation, I have mentioned it as a reminder
of this poetic manifestation, of live poetic manifestations, in
the VJ’s work.
4 A notion proposed by Merleau-Ponty.
Productive paradox in which he who feels and thinks is part of the
encounter, in the perception of a determined space/time.
5This is said as an analogy
with proposals such as the Model Reader and Implicit Reader presented
by Eco and Iser. Both are elements to be found in the text. |